<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kevin O. Woghiren</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinwoghiren.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinwoghiren.com</link>
	<description>...an introspection on the intriguing...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 03:15:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Crowd-Sourced Libel by Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinwoghiren.com/2012/02/crowd-sourced-libel/1010#comment-16717</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 03:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinwoghiren.com/?p=1010#comment-16717</guid>
		<description>Its not financed by gov&#039;t according to preliminary data I have read on the matter. If I understand your first question correctly, brand info comes from any contributor, like Wikipedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not financed by gov&#8217;t according to preliminary data I have read on the matter. If I understand your first question correctly, brand info comes from any contributor, like Wikipedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Crowd-Sourced Libel by Yuyu</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinwoghiren.com/2012/02/crowd-sourced-libel/1010#comment-16716</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuyu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 03:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinwoghiren.com/?p=1010#comment-16716</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious who will offer the brand information. Is this program financed by government?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious who will offer the brand information. Is this program financed by government?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on U.S. Debt Talks by Kimberly Young</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinwoghiren.com/2011/07/us-debt-talks/923#comment-12569</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinwoghiren.com/?p=923#comment-12569</guid>
		<description>Of course</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Intellectual Media by Power</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinwoghiren.com/ip#comment-6456</link>
		<dc:creator>Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 01:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinwoghiren.com/?page_id=90#comment-6456</guid>
		<description>I like those photos too,my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like those photos too,my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Defending the Yuan by Admin</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinwoghiren.com/2010/10/wheres-the-appreciation/816#comment-6435</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 06:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinwoghiren.com/?p=816#comment-6435</guid>
		<description>Hi Etinosa, your argument is circular to the point that its incoherent. Please elaborate on your main points. For example you mention that the U.S. is &quot;ignoring the economic trade advantages for China and its population&quot; but offer no proof while at the same time criticizing China for not having a fairer Yuan. Also in your second sentence, to which country are you referring to? Assuming that the U.S. already perceives its economic system as being fair, a rise in its savings rate will not completely erase its trade imbalance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Etinosa, your argument is circular to the point that its incoherent. Please elaborate on your main points. For example you mention that the U.S. is &#8220;ignoring the economic trade advantages for China and its population&#8221; but offer no proof while at the same time criticizing China for not having a fairer Yuan. Also in your second sentence, to which country are you referring to? Assuming that the U.S. already perceives its economic system as being fair, a rise in its savings rate will not completely erase its trade imbalance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

